Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[B. CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:04]

GOOD EVENING. IT IS 5:30 ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER THE 19TH, 2023.

I HEREBY CALL THE ROUND ROCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES PUBLIC HEARING ON ROUND ROCK ISD'S 2022-2023 SCHOOL FINANCIAL INTEGRITY RATING SYSTEM OF TEXAS, ALSO CALLED THE FIRST RATING TO ORDER TONIGHT IN ATTENDANCE, WE HAVE TRUSTEE ZARATE, WEIR, LANDRUM, HARRISON AND MARKHUM.

TRUSTEES BONE AND WESTON ARE ABSENT.

PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE.

ACTUALLY, WE HAVE MOVED OUR FLAGS, APPARENTLY WE DID NOT HAVE THEM POSTED CORRECTLY ACCORDING TO THE MILITARY.

SO THE AMERICAN FLAG IS SUPPOSED TO BE ON THIS SIDE, AND THE TEXAS FLAG IS SUPPOSED TO BE ON THIS SIDE.

SO WE'LL BE SWITCHING IN BETWEEN SO.

ALL RIGHT. READY? ALL RIGHT. WE DO NOT HAVE ANY PUBLIC SPEAKERS FOR TONIGHT'S PUBLIC HEARING, SO I WILL TURN IT OVER TO DR.

[E. PUBLIC HEARING: 2022-2023 SCHOOL FINANCIAL INTEGRITY RATING SYSTEM OF TEXAS (FIRST) RATING]

AZAIEZ TO INTRODUCE ITEM E1 PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2022-2023 SCHOOL FINANCIAL INTEGRITY RATING SYSTEM OF TEXAS.

GOOD EVENING, PRESIDENT LANDRUM, BOARD MEMBERS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND STAFF.

SO IT'S THAT TIME OF THE YEAR.

SO WE RECEIVED OUR FIRST THE RATING FOR THE FIRST.

AS YOU KNOW, WE RECEIVED THAT ONCE A YEAR AND WE RECEIVE THAT BASED ON TEA REQUIREMENTS.

AND SO IT'S OUR HONOR TO SHARE WITH YOU THAT WE AGAIN, OUR DISTRICT RECEIVED AN A THIS YEAR.

AND WITH US IS OUR CFO DENNIS COVINGTON.

MR. COVINGTON WILL BE TAKING YOU OVER ALL THE ALL THE I GUESS THE RATINGS.

BUT AGAIN IT'S IT'S A PLEASURE TO KNOW THAT WE ALSO RECEIVED ANOTHER ANOTHER A THIS YEAR FOR OUR DISTRICT.

THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, PRESIDENT LANDRUM AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SUPERINTENDENT, AS YOU SAID TONIGHT, WE'RE HERE TO PRESENT THE RESULTS OF THE 22-23 FIRST REPORT ON FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT BASED ON THE 21-22 FINANCIALS.

THE PURPOSE OF THE FIRST REPORT IS TO MEASURE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DISTRICT IN MANAGING SCHOOL FINANCES.

THE RATING IS BASED ON STAFF, STUDENT AND FINANCIAL DATA REPORTED TO TEA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR PRIOR TO THE RATING, SO THE 22-23 RATING IS BASED ON THE 21-22 FISCAL YEAR DATA.

DISTRICTS ARE RATED ON INDICATORS OUTLINED BY THE RULE OF COMMISSIONER ON EDUCATION.

THE SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO ENCOURAGE TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO BETTER MANAGE THEIR FINANCIAL RESOURCES, TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM ALLOCATION FOR INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT.

THE SCORING SYSTEM IS BROKEN OUT INTO THREE MAJOR INDICATORS.

CRITICAL INDICATORS ARE THOSE THAT ARE PASS OR FAIL, YES OR NO INDICATORS.

THE SECOND CATEGORY IS THE SOLVENCY INDICATORS, WHICH IS THE ABILITY OF THE DISTRICT TO MEET ITS DEBTS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS.

AND THE FINAL ONE IS OUR FINANCIAL COMPETENCY INDICATORS ABILITY TO ESTIMATE JUSTIFIABLE MANAGED FUNDING TO SUPPORT THE GOALS OF THE DISTRICT.

DETERMINATION OF THE RATINGS.

SECTION A DEALS WITH THE CRITICAL INDICATORS.

THESE ARE THE PASS OR FAIL, YES OR NO.

IF THE DISTRICT WOULD FAIL OR RECEIVE A NO ON ANY OF THE CATEGORIES 1-4, THE DISTRICT WOULD AUTOMATICALLY RECEIVE AN L FOR SUBSTANDARD ACHIEVEMENT. SECTION B IS THE REMAINING OF THE INDICATORS, WHICH ARE INDICATORS 5-20, AND THAT'S DETERMINED BY RATING BY APPLICABLE NUMBER OF POINTS.

AND AS DR. AZAIEZ SAID, WE RECEIVED A A BECAUSE WE RECEIVED 98 OF THE 100 POINTS.

IF A SCHOOL WAS TO RECEIVE A 70, IT WOULD RECEIVE AN F RATING FOR SUBSTANDARD ACHIEVEMENT.

SO LET'S GO THROUGH THE INDICATORS.

INDICATOR ONE WAS THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE TEA SET DEADLINE OF NOVEMBER 27TH.

[INAUDIBLE] WAS SUBMITTED TO TEA BY THE DEADLINE.

IT WAS DUE ON 12/27 TEA RECEIVED IT ON 11/18.

AS A RESULT, WE PASSED.

INDICATOR TWO.

WAS THERE AN UNMODIFIED OPINION IN THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS A WHOLE? ROUND ROCK RECEIVED AN UNMODIFIED OR CLEAN OPINION.

AS A RESULT, WE PASSED.

WAS THE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PAYMENT TERMS OF ALL DEBT AGREEMENTS AT THE FISCAL YEAR.

AND THE ANSWER IS YES.

AS A RESULT, WE PASSED.

[00:05:01]

INDICATOR FOUR, DID THE DISTRICT MAKE TIMELY PAYMENTS TO THE TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION AND INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, AND OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. ALL REPORTS WERE SUBMITTED TIMELY TO THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES.

AS A RESULT, WE PASSED.

INDICATOR FIVE.

THIS INDICATOR IS NOT BEING SCORED.

THE LAST TIME IT WAS SCORED, IT WAS IN THE 2017-18 FIRST REPORT AND IT MEASURED THE UNRESTRICTED NET POSITION OF THE DISTRICT.

AND BACK THEN IT WAS A YES FOR THE DISTRICT, BUT IT IS NO LONGER BEING SCORED.

INDICATOR SIX WAS THE AVERAGE CHANGE IN ASSIGNED AND UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE OVER THREE YEARS, LESS THAN A 25% DECREASE.

OR DID THE CURRENT YEARS ASSIGNED AND UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE EXCEED 75 DAYS OF OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURES? SO WE LOOKED AT THE ASSIGNED AND UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE, AND THE TOTAL WAS [INAUDIBLE] $166.8 MILLION.

AND OUR 75 DAYS OF OPERATING EXPENSES IS $101.7 MILLION.

SO OUR ASSIGNED AND UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE EXCEEDED THE 75 DAYS.

AND AS A RESULT, WE PASSED.

SOME MIGHT ASK WHAT IS THE ASSIGNED AND UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE? ASSIGNED MEANS THAT THOSE DOLLARS ARE COMMITTED FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE.

AND LAST YEAR, AND THIS YEAR, $23 MILLION OF THE $166 IS ASSIGNED AND $143 IS UNASSIGNED.

UNASSIGNED MEANS THERE IS NO DESIGNATED PURPOSE FOR THE MONEY.

SO AS A RESULT, WE PASSED INDICATOR SIX.

INDICATOR SEVEN WAS THE NUMBER OF DAYS OF CASH ON HAND AND CURRENT INVESTMENTS IN THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT SUFFICIENT TO COVER OPERATING EXPENDITURES, EXCLUDING FACILITIES, ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION.

OUR CASH AND EQUIVALENTS WAS A $244.6 MILLION.

CURRENT INVESTMENTS $20 MILLION.

TOTAL EXPENDITURES WAS $499 MILLION, AND THE FACILITY ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION WAS $4.4 MILLION.

AND SO THE NUMBER OF DAYS THAT WE HAD CASH ON HAND WAS 195.

SO THE NUMBER OF DAYS I'M SORRY IT SHOULD BE 195 EXCEEDS THE 90 DAY REQUIREMENT FOR MAXIMUM POINTS, SO WE RECEIVED TEN OF TEN POINTS.

INDICATOR EIGHT WAS A MEASURE OF CURRENT ASSETS TO CURRENT LIABILITIES RATIO FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, SUFFICIENT TO COVER SHORT TERM DEBT.

CURRENT ASSETS WERE $632.6 MILLION AND THE CURRENT LIABILITIES, THIS WAS THE $234.2 WITH THE RATIO OF 2.7, AND THAT RATIO EARNED US EIGHT OF THE TEN POINTS.

INDICATOR NINE.

DID THE SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL FUND REVENUE EQUAL OR EXCEED EXPENDITURES? IF NOT, WHAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER OF DAYS OF CASH ON HAND GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 60 DAYS.

AGAIN, WE LOOKED AT THE NUMBER OF DAYS OF CASH ON HAND, WHICH IS THE 195, AND IT EXCEEDED THE 60 DAYS REQUIRED.

AS A RESULT, THE DISTRICT RECEIVED TEN OF THE TEN POINTS.

INDICATOR TEN.

THIS INDICATOR WAS NOT SCORED FOR THIS YEAR, AND IT HAS NOT BEEN SCORED SINCE THE 2020 -2021 REPORT, AND IT MEASURED THE BUDGET REVENUE COMPARED TO THE ACTUAL REVENUE AND BACK IN 2020-21 THE DISTRICT DID RECEIVE TEN OF THE TEN RESPECTIVE POINTS.

INDICATOR 11 WAS THE RATIO OF LONG TERM LIABILITIES TO TOTAL ASSETS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, SUFFICIENT TO COVER LONG TERM SOLVENCY.

IF THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS INCREASE OF STUDENTS AND MEMBERSHIP OVER FIVE YEARS OR 7% OR MORE THAN, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AUTOMATICALLY PASSES THIS INDICATOR.

IF YOU LOOK IN THE MIDDLE, YOU SEE OUR TOTAL STUDENTS IS DECLINING, SO WE USE THE TOP PORTION TO DETERMINE THE RATIO OF 58.9.

AND AS A RESULT, WE RECEIVE TEN OF THE TEN POINTS.

WAS THE DEBT PER $100 OF ASSESSED PROPERTY VALUE RATIO, SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT FUTURE DEBT REPAYMENT.

SO THE FORMULA TO CALCULATE THIS IS SORT OF CUMBERSOME.

SO YOU TAKE THE TOTAL LOCAL AND IMMEDIATE SOURCES OF REVENUE.

DIVIDE IT BY YOUR TOTAL REVENUE MULTIPLIED BY YOUR LONG TERM LIABILITIES TIMES 100 DIVIDED BY YOUR ASSESSED PROPERTY VALUE TO GET THE RATIO OF 2.05, OUR 2.05 RATIO MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF LESS THAN FOUR FOR MAXIMUM REPORTS OF TEN OF TEN.

INDICATOR 13 WAS SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS RATIO EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN THE THRESHOLD RATIO.

OUR DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS RATIO IS 0.0558.

DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE RATIO WAS SIGNIFICANTLY BELOW THE THRESHOLD RATIO OF 0.855 FOR A ADA OF 10,000 STUDENTS OR MORE, RESULT TEN OF TEN POINTS. INDICATOR 14.

THIS INDICATOR HAS NOT BEEN SCORED THIS YEAR.

AND IT WAS.

THIS IS THE FIRST YEAR THAT IT WAS NOT WAS SCORED.

LAST YEAR IT MEASURED THE STUDENT TO STAFF RATIO AND THE DISTRICT DID RECEIVE TEN OF THE TEN POINTS LAST YEAR.

[00:10:08]

INDICATOR 15.

THIS ONE ALSO HAS NOT BEEN SCORED SINCE THE 2021 REPORT, AND IT MEASURED THE ACTUAL ADA TO THE BIENNIAL PROJECTED ADA, AND THE LAST TIME IT WAS SCORED, THE DISTRICT RECEIVED FIVE OF THE FIVE POINTS.

INDICATOR 16 DID THE COMPARISON OF PUBLIC EDUCATION INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PEIMS DATA TO LIKE INFORMATION IN THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS AFR RESULT IN A TOTAL VARIANCE OF LESS THAN 3% OF ALL EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION.

AND AS YOU CAN SEE, BASED ON THE FORMULA OF THE SUM OF THE DIFFERENCE AND DIVIDED BY ALL EXPENDITURES, THE RATIO IS 0.0033, AND IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF LESS THAN 0.03 TO PASS THIS TEST RESULT, THE DISTRICT PASSED.

INDICATOR 17 DID THE EXTERNAL INDEPENDENT AUDITOR REPORT THE AFR WAS FREE OF ANY INSTANCES OF MATERIAL WEAKNESSES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE FOR LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL FUNDS.

THERE WERE NO MATERIAL WEAKNESSES REPORTED AND AS A RESULT, DISTRICT PASSED.

INDICATOR 18.

DID THE EXTERNAL INDEPENDENT AUDITOR INDICATE THE AFR WAS FREE OF ANY INSTANCES OF MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE FOR GRANTS, CONTRACTS, AND LAWS RELATED TO LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL FUNDS.

NO INSTANCES OF MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE WERE REPORTED.

AS A RESULT, THE DISTRICT RECEIVED TEN OF TEN POINTS.

INDICATOR 19.

DID THE SCHOOL DISTRICT POST THE REQUIRED FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON ITS WEBSITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL CODE, LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, TEXAS EDUCATION CODE, TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, AND OTHER STATUTES, LAWS AND RULES THAT WERE IN EFFECT AT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT'S FISCAL YEAR END.

GLAD TO REPORT THE DISTRICT POSTED ALL THE REQUIRED FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON ITS WEBSITE AND RECEIVED FIVE OF THE FIVE POINTS.

AND INDICATOR 20, DID SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS DISCUSS THE DISTRICT'S PROPERTY VALUES AT A BOARD MEETING WITHIN 120 DAYS BEFORE THE DISTRICT ADOPTED THIS BUDGET? AND THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE DISTRICT PROPERTY VALUE AT A BOARD MEETING WITHIN THOSE 120 DAYS BEFORE THE DISTRICT ADOPTED THIS BUDGET, AND AS A RESULT, THE DISTRICT PASSED.

SO OF THE TOTAL POINTS AVAILABLE, 100 ROUND ROCK RECEIVED 98 FOR A FINAL RATING OF A SUPERIOR ACHIEVEMENT.

IN ADDITION TO THE FIRST REPORT, THERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

THE OUTSIDE COMPENSATION RECEIVED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT FOR THE 21-22 SCHOOL YEAR, THE SUPERINTENDENT DID NOT RECEIVE PAYMENT OF FOR CONSULTING OR OTHER PERSONAL SERVICES, AND SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD GIFTS.

THE SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD MEMBERS DID NOT RECEIVE ANY GIFTS WITH ECONOMIC VALUE OF $250 OR MORE.

THIS CHART SHOWS THE BOARD AND THE SUPERINTENDENTS TRAVEL.

AND THIS IS TRAVEL FOR LAST YEAR NOT THE 21-22 YEAR, BUT THE END OF THE 2023 YEAR, WHICH IS THE REQUIREMENT TO POST.

AND AS YOU CAN SEE BY EACH PERSON'S NAME, YOU LIST THE HOTEL MILEAGE, PARKING, TRANSPORTATION, FLIGHT REGISTRATION, MEALS, OTHER GIFTS, REIMBURSEMENTS FOR A TOTAL AND AS A TOTAL BOARD MEMBERS AND THE SUPERINTENDENT, AS FAR AS TRAVEL, SPENT $28.7 THOUSAND.

ANOTHER ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT IS BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND BOARD MEMBERS.

AND I'M SO PROUD TO SAY THAT THERE WAS NO TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND BOARD MEMBERS OF ANY KIND FOR THE 2023 SCHOOL YEAR.

WE'RE ALSO REQUIRED TO SUPPORT, I MEAN, TO POST THE SITE WHERE YOU CAN SEE AND REVIEW THE SUPERINTENDENTS CONTRACT.

AND IF YOU WERE TO CLICK ON THAT LINK, IT WILL TAKE YOU TO THE SUPERINTENDENTS CURRENT CONTRACT.

MADAM CHAIR, THAT IS A 22-23 FINANCIAL INTEGRITY RATING SYSTEM OF TEXAS ANNUAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REPORT BASED ON THE 2021-22 FINANCIALS.

AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICT IS PROUD TO SAY WE RECEIVED AN A FOR SUPERIOR.

ANY QUESTIONS? WONDERFUL. I HAVE A LIGHT ON FROM TRUSTEE WEIR.

I WAS JUST WONDERING, MR. COVINGTON ON 16, 17 AND 18 AFR IF YOU COULD JUST LET EVERYONE KNOW WHAT THAT ACRONYM STANDS FOR.

THAT'S THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT THAT THE OUTSIDE AUDITOR COMES IN AND DO EVERY YEAR.

I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER LIGHTS ON, BUT I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION MYSELF.

DO PRIVATE SCHOOLS HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS FIRST RATING PROCESS? NO, NO THEY DON'T.

NO. SO NO CHARTERS.

WHAT KIND OF CHARTERS DON'T EITHER.

WHAT KIND OF TRANSPARENCY DO THEY HAVE FOR THEIR FINANCES?

[00:15:03]

THAT I DON'T KNOW.

OKAY. BUT THEY DON'T.

THEY'RE NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME [INAUDIBLE] SAME AS WE ARE AS A PUBLIC SCHOOL.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER LIGHTS ON.

I DO HAVE ONE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC SPEAKER.

AS A REMINDER, IN PUBLIC HEARINGS, YOU CAN SIGN UP ANY TIME THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING IS GOING ON.

SO I WILL READ OUR PUBLIC HEARING SCRIPT.

AT EACH BOARD MEETING, THE BOARD WILL SET ASIDE TIME TO AFFORD THE GENERAL PUBLIC AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO ITEMS ON THE AGENDA.

WE ASK THAT CONCERNS OR COMPLAINTS REGARDING SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS NOT BE RAISED IN THIS PUBLIC FORUM.

SPECIFIC CONCERNS ABOUT EMPLOYEES OR FORMER EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY ACCORDING TO APPLICABLE BOARD POLICIES.

THE BOARD REQUESTS THAT COMMENTS, WHETHER POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, BE COURTEOUS AND RESPECTFUL.

I WOULD LIKE TO REMIND THE AUDIENCE AND THE VIEWERS THAT THE COMMENTS OF THE SPEAKER REFLECT THEIR OWN POSITIONS OR OPINIONS.

AS A SECOND REMINDER, THE BOARD ADOPTED AN ANTI HATE RESOLUTION ON JANUARY 20TH, 2022, WHERE THE BOARD REAFFIRMED ITS COMMITMENT TO THE WELL-BEING AND SAFETY OF ALL PEOPLE, REGARDLESS OF RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN, RELIGION, SEX, GENDER IDENTITY, GENDER EXPRESSION, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, DISABILITY, AGE, OR POLITICAL BELIEFS, AND STANDS AGAINST SPEECH THAT INCITES HATRED AND VIOLENCE TOWARDS ANY PERSON.

PLEASE NOTE THAT WHILE THE PUBLIC DOES HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPEAK, THAT RIGHT IS NOT UNLIMITED.

PER TEXAS PENAL CODE 38.13, 42.01, 42.02 AND 42.05, AND TEXAS EDUCATION CODE 37.105.

NO AUDIENCE MEMBER OR SPEAKER WILL BE PERMITTED TO ENGAGE IN ANY CONDUCT THAT IS DISRUPTIVE OR THREATENING TOWARD ANY SPEAKER OR OTHER PERSON, OR TO VIOLATE THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF ANOTHER PERSON.

THE BOARD SHALL NOT TOLERATE DISRUPTION OF THE MEETING BY MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE.

IF, AFTER AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL WARNING FROM THE PRESIDING OFFICER, AN INDIVIDUAL CONTINUES TO DISRUPT THE MEETING BY HIS OR HER WORDS OR ACTIONS, THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL REQUEST ASSISTANCE FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS TO HAVE THE INDIVIDUAL REMOVED FROM THE MEETING.

THE BOARD MAY NOT DISCUSS OR ACT UPON ANY MATTER THAT IS NOT LISTED UNDER THE ACTION PORTION OF THE AGENDA.

THEREFORE, BOARD MEMBERS MAY NOT DISCUSS THE COMMENTS OF THE SPEAKER.

PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT A LACK OF RESPONSE FROM THE BOARD DOES NOT INDICATE AGREEMENT OR APPROVAL OF THE COMMENTS.

SPEAKERS WILL BE GIVEN TWO MINUTES TO ADDRESS THE BOARD.

TRUSTEE HARRISON WILL BE THE DESIGNATED TIMEKEEPER AND OUR SPEAKER IS DOUG MCLEAN, SPEAKING ON AGENDA ITEM E1.

AND YOU DO LIVE IN THE DISTRICT.

HELLO BOARD MEMBERS. THANK YOU.

CONGRATULATIONS 19 OUT OF 20 YEARS A GOOD JOB ON THE FINANCES.

I APPRECIATE THE BOARD MEMBERS WHO ARE HERE.

CONSPICUOUSLY ABSENT BOARD MEMBERS WESTON, BONE WISH THEY WERE HERE TO HEAR THIS AS WELL.

THIS SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO MAXIMIZE ALLOCATION POSSIBLE FOR DIRECT INSTRUCTIONAL PURPOSES.

WE HAVE HAD A RISING TIDE WITH PEOPLE MOVING INTO THE ROUND ROCK AREA.

I THINK IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THAT MAY CHANGE, BUT ALSO FEET MAY LEAVE.

SCHOOL VOUCHERS, WHICH ARE ON THE AGENDA IN THE LEGISLATURE MAY MEAN THAT DOLLARS LEAVE OUT OF HERE AND FOOTSTEPS OF STUDENTS LEAVE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. THAT MEANS THAT IT WOULD BE UNWISE INVESTMENT TO HAVE CERTAIN SCHOOLS THAT ARE SITTING THERE VACANT IF A CERTAIN NUMBER OF STUDENTS LEAVE.

SO I THINK SCHOOL VOUCHERS ARE A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO OUR CURRENT ISD.

UNUSED BOOKS WOULD BE A WASTE.

AND BANNING BOOKS, I THINK, IS A VERY BAD THING.

AND HAVING BOOKS BANNED IN OUR SYSTEM WOULD BE A WASTE OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES.

THAT WOULD BE A WASTE, AND WE DON'T WANT TO WASTE OUR FINANCIAL RESOURCES.

SO NOT USING BOOKS THAT WE'VE ALREADY PURCHASED AND BANNING THEM, PUTTING THEM ON THE SHELF WHERE THEY ARE NOT ACCESSIBLE TO OUR STUDENTS TO LEARN WOULD BE A BAD IDEA AND A FINANCIAL WASTE UNDER THIS.

SO WE ALSO DO NOT WANT TO WASTE RESOURCES OF THE ISD ON LAWYERS IN FIGHTING AMONGST THE BOARD AND OTHER THINGS 30 SECONDS WASTE RESOURCES OF THE BOARD.

PLEASE, LET'S NOT HAVE INFIGHTING.

LET'S DO THE THINGS WE CAN DO FOR THE KIDS.

SHORT TERM DEBT EIGHT OUT OF TEN.

THAT'S YOUR ONLY DING THERE.

THAT'S A CONCERN IF WE LOSE KIDS TO THE VOUCHER SYSTEM.

OTHERWISE GREAT JOB AND THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING HERE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS? ALL RIGHT. THAT'S IT.

SEEING NOTHING ELSE ON THE AGENDA AND NO LIGHTS FROM ANY SPEAKERS.

IT IS 5:49 AND THIS MEETING IS ADJOURNED.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.